Skip to content
SPM Tuition
Constitutional negotiations of 1957 practice

Constitutional negotiations of 1957: practice

You know the bodies and agreements from your notes, but have never tested them on a fresh case.

These eight questions use an invented territory called Tanjung Baru, so you can practise the skills from constitutional negotiations of 1957 on a clean case. Write your own answer before opening each explanation.

Questions

Q1. In Tanjung Baru, a commission of outside experts was appointed to recommend a constitution. Name its role in one sentence, and say what it could not do.

Answer

The commission studied the territory’s needs and recommended the shape of a constitution. It could not make the constitution law, because that decision belonged to the bodies that accepted or amended its report. The skill is in identifying the roles of constitutional bodies: recommend, approve and enact are different roles.

Q2. Match each body to its role. Bodies: Council of Chiefs, Legislative Assembly, Delegation to the colonial office. Roles: (a) approve the final text for the territory, (b) speak for the territory in talks abroad, (c) protect the position of the traditional rulers.

Answer

Council of Chiefs matches (c), Legislative Assembly matches (a), and the Delegation matches (b). Each match follows what the body was formed to do, not its name or its size.

Q3. The chiefs wanted their powers kept, and the elected members wanted a government answerable to voters. Explain how a compromise could satisfy both.

Answer

The chiefs keep a ceremonial and protective position, while day-to-day government answers to an elected assembly. Each side gives up something: the chiefs give up direct control, and the elected members accept a lasting place for the chiefs. A good answer names what each side gave up, as taught in explaining negotiation and compromise.

Q4. A student writes: “The talks were difficult but everyone agreed in the end.” Say why this sentence scores weakly.

Answer

It has no named party, no disagreement and no outcome. Improve it: “The chiefs and the elected members disagreed over who would control the budget, and the final text gave the assembly that power while keeping the chiefs’ role in protocol.”

Q5. The Tanjung Baru constitution says: “Every person born in the territory before the date of the constitution may apply for citizenship.” State the purpose of this provision and one effect.

Answer

Purpose: to settle who belongs to the new state, so the voters and the citizens are clearly defined. Effect: families born in the territory gained a legal status that did not depend on the colonial government. Link the provision to its stated purpose, using the method from connecting constitutional provisions with stated purposes.

Q6. Why is it risky to say that a provision “was created because” of a later event without evidence?

Answer

A later event cannot cause an earlier provision. Connect a provision to the purpose the document itself states or to the discussion recorded before it was written. Otherwise the answer claims a link that the sources do not show.

Q7. Source A (commission report): “The commission recommends that the head of state act on the advice of the elected assembly.” Source B (chiefs’ letter): “The chiefs ask that their advice on customs be heard.” Write one claim that uses both sources.

Answer

“The negotiations combined elected authority with a protected role for the chiefs: Source A gives the assembly the power to advise the head of state, and Source B shows that the chiefs asked to be heard on customs.” The claim names each source and says what it shows. The method is in organising a multi-source answer.

Q8. Plan a four-part answer to “Explain the importance of compromise in writing the Tanjung Baru constitution”. Use Sources A and B from Q7.

Answer

(1) Point: compromise let two groups with different aims accept one text. (2) Evidence: Source A for elected authority, Source B for the chiefs’ role. (3) Explanation: each group kept something it valued, so neither had a reason to reject the constitution. (4) Link back: acceptance by both groups allowed the territory to move to self-rule.

If you got these wrong

Q1 and Q2 belong to identifying the roles of constitutional bodies. Q3 and Q4 need explaining negotiation and compromise.

Q5 and Q6 use connecting constitutional provisions with stated purposes. Q7 and Q8 use organising a multi-source answer.

The evidence-to-explanation planner and the mistake log help you repeat the weaker skills. For teacher support, see online one-to-one Sejarah tuition.

Common questions

Are the events in these questions real?

No. The territory of Tanjung Baru, its commission and its council are invented, so you practise the skills without leaning on memory. Use your textbook and the lessons for the real bodies, names and dates in the syllabus.

How long should I spend on each question?

Give yourself about three minutes for Q1 to Q4 and about eight minutes for Q5 to Q8. Write the answer first, then open the explanation and compare the reasoning, not only the conclusion.

What should I do after a wrong answer?

Read the lesson named under the answer, rewrite your response, and then invent a similar case of your own. Record the slip in a mistake log so you can see whether it repeats.

A one-to-one Sejarah teacher can read your written answers to these questions and show whether the gap is in roles, compromise, purposes or source use.

  • Online one-to-one lessons for your child with an experienced teacher.
  • Your first class is a one-hour trial, from RM50. The fee is agreed before you book.
  • Happy with the teacher? Continue with lessons of about 1.5 hours. If not, ask for another teacher.