Skip to content
SPM Tuition
Sejarah · Constitutional negotiations of 1957

How to organise a multi-source answer

You read every source, then write about them one by one and miss the overall point.

A multi-source answer is organised around claims, not around sources. The routine is group, claim, link.

This lesson closes the cluster on constitutional negotiations of 1957, after connecting provisions with stated purposes.

  1. Group: put sources that support the same point together.
  2. Claim: write one sentence that states the point.
  3. Link: show how each grouped source proves it, then add your own knowledge.

The question decides the claims. If it asks “how was agreement reached”, your claims will be about discussion, demands and outcome.

Worked example with three sources

All three sources are original. Source A: “Representatives from different groups submitted written proposals to the commission.” Source B: “The draft was discussed and some changes were requested.” Source C: “After discussion, the groups agreed on one text.”

The question: “Explain how agreement on the constitution was reached, using the sources.”

Grouping: Source A shows views being put forward. Sources B and C show discussion and then agreement. So the answer has two claims.

Claim 1 (views were put forward): Source A shows that groups submitted written proposals, so the drafting began with the views of different communities. Your textbook adds which bodies received them.

Claim 2 (discussion led to agreement): Source B shows that changes were requested, which means the draft was not accepted as it stood. Source C shows that the groups then agreed on one text, so discussion ended in a shared outcome.

A closing sentence joins the claims: “Together the sources show a process of proposal, discussion and agreement.”

The mistake to avoid

The slip is to write one paragraph per source. It looks tidy but never answers “how”.

Weak Strong
“Source A says… Source B says… Source C says…” “Views were put forward (A). Discussion led to changes (B) and then to agreement (C).”

If your paragraph starts with “Source”, check whether it could start with a claim instead.

Check yourself

Using the three sources above, write the opening sentence of a paragraph on how the draft changed.

Answer

“The draft changed through discussion, as Source B shows when changes were requested before the text was accepted.”

The sentence begins with a claim, then names the source and the evidence. It can be extended with one sentence of textbook knowledge.

What to study next

Test the whole cluster with the practice set. Plan each answer with the evidence-to-explanation planner and track repeated slips in the mistake log.

For a teacher to help you restructure your answers, see online one-to-one Sejarah tuition.

Common questions

Should I discuss each source separately?

Only if the question asks for it. Usually a stronger answer groups sources by the point they support and writes one claim per paragraph, with evidence from each source that backs the claim.

What if two sources disagree?

Say so and explain the difference. One source may show a demand while another shows the outcome, or each may reflect the view of a different group. Describe the difference without taking a side.

How much of each source should I quote?

Quote or paraphrase only the part that proves your claim. A short phrase, placed inside your own sentence, is enough. Long copied sections use time and add no reasoning.

Do I still need my own knowledge?

Yes. Sources show evidence, and your textbook knowledge explains what it means. Put the source first, then add what you know that makes the source clearer.

When you use every source but the answer still reads as a list, a one-to-one Sejarah teacher can help you restructure it around claims, and you rewrite it yourself.

  • Online one-to-one lessons for your child with an experienced teacher.
  • Your first class is a one-hour trial, from RM50. The fee is agreed before you book.
  • Happy with the teacher? Continue with lessons of about 1.5 hours. If not, ask for another teacher.