Skip to content
SPM Tuition
Lesson · Business

Cash-flow effect of buying versus leasing

You know that leasing costs more over time, but the question asks about cash, not total cost.

Buying an asset takes a large amount of cash at the start, while leasing takes a small amount each month. A cash-flow answer names the month-one effect first, then the total cost over the full period.

This lesson is part of finance decisions in an original case. The idea of a closing balance comes from interpreting cash-flow forecasts.

What are the two horizons?

Look at the choice twice, and keep the two answers apart. They often point in different directions.

  1. Month 1: how much cash leaves the business at the start?
  2. Whole term: how much is paid in total?

A business can do well on the second horizon and fail on the first, because running out of cash in month 1 is a failure that totals cannot rescue.

Worked example: an invented oven

Dapur Kek Nurul can buy an oven for RM18 000 or lease it for RM600 each month over 36 months. The owner has RM9 000 in savings.

Buy: month-1 cash out is RM18 000. Closing cash: 9 000 − 18 000 = −RM9 000, so the owner cannot buy without finance. Lease: month-1 cash out is RM600, so closing cash is 9 000 − 600 = RM8 400.

Now the second horizon. The lease total is 36 × RM600 = RM21 600, which is RM3 600 more than the RM18 000 purchase price.

Choice Month-1 cash Cash after month 1 Total over 36 months
Buy RM18 000 −RM9 000 RM18 000
Lease RM600 RM8 400 RM21 600

The mistake of comparing totals only

The common slip is to write: “Buying is cheaper by RM3 600, so the owner should buy.” This ignores the question about cash.

The repair keeps both horizons: “Buying saves RM3 600 over 36 months, but it needs RM18 000 at once and leaves the bakery RM9 000 short in month 1. Leasing keeps RM8 400 in cash, so it suits a business with limited savings.”

Check yourself

Leasing a display counter costs RM150 each month for 24 months, while buying costs RM3 000. Find the month-1 cash difference and the total difference.

Answer

Month 1: buying needs RM3 000, leasing needs RM150, so leasing saves 3 000 − 150 = RM2 850 of cash at the start.

Total: leasing costs 24 × RM150 = RM3 600, which is 3 600 − 3 000 = RM600 more than buying. Leasing is cheaper for cash now, and dearer over two years.

What to study next

The next lesson tests a final recommendation against every limit in the case. Continue with checking a recommendation against the case constraints.

The cash, profit and transaction timeline shows the month-by-month effect of each choice. For a teacher to work through timing questions with you, see online one-to-one Business tuition.

Common questions

What is leasing?

Leasing means paying regular amounts to use an asset without owning it. The business spends less cash at the start, but usually pays more in total over the lease than the purchase price.

Why might a business choose the option with the higher total cost?

It may need to keep cash for running costs or emergencies. A lower payment at the start can keep the business open, even if the total over several years is higher.

Is buying always better over a long time?

Not always. Buying usually costs less in total if the asset is used for years, but it needs cash at the start, and the business may also pay for repairs. Compare both horizons using the case figures.

How do I explain a cash-flow consequence?

State the cash figure at the start, compare it with the cash available, and say what happens to the closing balance. Then state the longer-term cost as a second point, separate from cash.

If you compare only totals, a one-to-one Business teacher can set cash-timing cases and show why the answer changes with the time period.

  • Online one-to-one lessons for your child with an experienced teacher.
  • Your first class is a one-hour trial, from RM50. The fee is agreed before you book.
  • Happy with the teacher? Continue with lessons of about 1.5 hours. If not, ask for another teacher.